Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Fake Online Information v. Real Online Information: Reading a Website

When we search for information using a search engine, sometimes our results consist of a lot of junk! This guide is to assist you with using the CRAAP test to identify what is junk/fake information and what is real.

Reading a Website

Applying the CRAAP Test (Currency-Relevancy-Authority-Accuracy-Purpose) to reading a website takes a few seconds but saves you the trouble of spending too much time on an unreliable website.

*Don't know the CRAAP Test? Click here!*

Example 1

Website: EPA.Gov -U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1. Currency: Recent reports have all been written within the past year, it's current!

2. Relevancy: The website is on my research topic!

3. Authority: EPA is the U.S. government agency responsible for researching environmental issues (epa.gov).

4. Accuracy: Government information is reviewed for accuracy prior to publication. It is often used by academic and business work/research and reproduced in other publications/websites.

5. Purpose: To inform and educate.

Results: REAL information!


Example 2

Website: Takepart.com

1. Currency: No date.

2. Relevancy: Yes, it relates to my research topic.

3. Authority: Nothing is known of the author. The website is a .com, which means it’s a commercial website with advertisements to sell you things.

4. Accuracy: No references made for where information came from.

5. Purpose: The agenda of the information is to inform for the purpose of change, i.e. there is a motive behind the information.

Results: Junk! Toss it out!

 

Ask a Librarian